change your conflict
  • Home
  • About
  • HOW TO CHANGE
    • Separation and Divorce Mediation
    • Marriage Mediation
    • Business Mediation
    • Training
  • VOICES
  • Resources
  • Contact

conflict change
speaks

The Truth About Win Win

11/12/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
When will we start telling the truth about negotiation? For many years, much negotiation training has been focused on seeking win-win results. This concept was popularized by Fisher and Ury’s extremely influential Getting to Yes. 
 
The search for a win-win outcome differentiates “Getting to Yes” principled negotiation from distributive negotiation which is usually a zero-sum game i.e. if I win, you will lose. In a principled negotiation, the parties will seek to understand each other’s interests and expand the pie i.e. invent new options for mutual gain.
 
I recently attended a talk by Professor Michelle LeBarron from the University of British Columbia. She suggested that we need to stop telling parties that they can achieve win-win outcomes. The reason?  Even if the parties manage to negotiate a resolution, it is usually more a case of “mostly ok – mostly ok”.
 
In most negotiations, no party will get 100% of what they want – if they do get 100% the process is probably not a negotiation. Most parties in mediation (which is a facilitated negotiation) will end up achieving some of their own goals and allowing the other party to meet some of their goals.  This is why the ‘mostly ok’ description makes sense to me from what I have seen in practice.
 
But is it true for the parties?  We know from developments in neuroscience that we are programmed to experience losses more intensely than gains. It is not uncommon for both parties in mediation to feel taht they have made all the concessions, whilst ignoring any gains.
 
I think that for many parties the most significant gains are those that will only reveal themselves as they live the agreement.  At the point of finalizing the deal, parties are often unable to appreciate the benefits that will accrue over time:
 
  • The benefit of resolution to their emotional and psychological wellbeing
  • The ability to refocus on their family, health, business, etc.
  • The time / emotional / financial benefit of not having to fight a court battle
  • The potential, if relevant, to rebuild the relationship
 
One party said to me some months after he had signed his mediation agreement, that he had not realized “the amount of space in [his] mind that was being used up” by his dispute. That space had become free for his family, his health and his business.

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    May 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    May 2017
    November 2016

    Categories

    All
    Arbitration
    Business Mediation
    Conflict
    Events
    Family Mediation
    Flow
    Mediation
    Negotiation
    Psychology

    RSS Feed

Privacy Policy
The information contained in this website is for general information only and is provided without any representations or warranties. You should seek independent legal, financial, mental health or other advice in relation to your specific circumstances.

Hours

By appointment only

Email

sala@conflictchange.com

All rights reserved. 2020 Conflict Change Consulting Limited
  • Home
  • About
  • HOW TO CHANGE
    • Separation and Divorce Mediation
    • Marriage Mediation
    • Business Mediation
    • Training
  • VOICES
  • Resources
  • Contact